The Cost Plus Method is a widely accepted transfer pricing technique used for evaluating intercompany transactions, particularly where manufacturing or service functions are performed within a multinational group. In the UAE, where tax transparency and global alignment with OECD guidelines are increasingly emphasised, this method plays a significant role in ensuring fair profitability and regulatory compliance. Companies across free zones and onshore jurisdictions frequently rely on structured benchmarking to substantiate markups and align pricing with arm’s length principles, often supported by transfer pricing advisory to maintain defensibility.

Understanding the Role of the Cost Plus Method in UAE-based Groups

The Cost Plus Method determines an appropriate markup on costs incurred by a tested party. It is primarily used for contract manufacturing, toll manufacturing, shared service centres, and routine intragroup support functions.

This approach evaluates gross profit relative to total costs and benchmarks it against comparable independent market data. In the UAE, the method is often preferred by tax authorities for low-risk entities performing back-office or operational support activities.

It is also widely applied where the tested party performs limited risks, such as contract manufacturers or routine service providers, rather than full-fledged entrepreneurial entities.

Key Drivers of Arm’s Length Markups

The markup derived under this method is not arbitrary; it is driven by several economic and business factors.

These include the nature of activity, asset utilisation, risk assumption, market competition, and industry profitability norms. The determination of appropriate markups is anchored to real-world comparables that reflect similar functions, risks, and assets.

Companies operating in manufacturing or intra-group shared service environments benefit from professional assessments to ensure that markups align with OECD directives while remaining compliant with UAE tax frameworks, especially following the introduction of corporate tax regulations.

With the growing scale of cross-border transactions in the UAE market, benchmarking for markup determination often requires deep market intelligence supported by transfer pricing advisory and consistent economic analysis.

Functional Analysis in Cost Plus Applications

Functional analysis is a foundational process when applying the Cost Plus Method. It evaluates the scope of functions performed, risks borne, and assets utilised by the entity involved in manufacturing or service delivery.

This analysis ensures that the markup reflects commercial realities rather than formulaic pricing.

In a manufacturing setup, the range of functions performed—such as procurement, assembly, packaging, and quality control—will guide the markup level.

Entities engaging in more complex manufacturing typically justify higher markups. Similarly, service providers with technical skillsets or specialised intellectual property inputs may command higher profitability.

In contrast, support service providers executing standardised or back-office tasks often adopt lower markups due to their routine role.

The application of this method in the UAE typically correlates with tax transparency, stamping out artificial profit shifting by ensuring value is retained where functions and resources are deployed.

Application of the Cost Plus Method in Manufacturing Operations

Manufacturing groups in the UAE—whether operating as contract manufacturers or independent production facilities—leverage this method to establish defensible intercompany pricing.

For contract manufacturers, the focus lies on recovering direct and indirect production costs, plus a reasonable markup. Key cost components include raw materials (if applicable), labour, overhead allocation, and quality assurance-related expenditure.

The markup assessment involves benchmarking against comparable contract manufacturers in similar markets using publicly available financial databases. This step ensures that pricing outcomes align with industry norms.

Manufacturers acting under low-risk profiles can benefit from stable and predictable margins, safeguarding operational continuity and reducing tax exposure.

In cases of toll manufacturing, where raw material ownership remains with the principal, the markup is generally lower than in contract manufacturing models, as the manufacturer’s risk profile is limited to conversion activities.

Application in Service-Based Transactions

The Cost Plus Method is widely applied to intragroup support services and operational shared service centres that operate within multinational corporate structures based in or operating through the UAE.

Service markups depend on the nature of contributions and the value chain role of the service provider.

Back-office, administrative, or non-strategic services typically carry lower markups due to their support function. Meanwhile, specialised or consultative services reflect higher markups as they incorporate additional skill-based or risk-related contributions.

In service applications, appropriate cost characterisation is essential. Allocation keys, overhead recovery policies, and internal documentation must be carefully aligned with arm’s length standards.

UAE-based shared service hubs supporting regional operations rely on accurate cost base calculation and commercial justification to withstand tax authority review.

Cost Base Determination and Allocation Practices

Accurate cost identification is integral to implementing the Cost Plus Method successfully.

The cost base typically includes direct and indirect expenses relevant to the function being tested. Direct costs represent labour, raw material inputs, and production-linked expenses. Indirect costs may include overheads such as utilities, depreciation, and management costs that support service or manufacturing activity.

Where services support multiple jurisdictions or service lines, allocation keys are required to distribute costs equitably. These keys must be commercially logical—based on time utilisation, revenue contribution, or resource allocation patterns.

Transparent cost allocation frameworks are essential for supporting internal corporate governance as well as UAE corporate tax compliance expectations.

Comparability Standards in Markup Selection

The benchmarking process requires selection of suitable comparables from commercial databases that mirror market behaviour for similar entities.

Comparability adjustments may be necessary where differences in function or risk structure exist.

Gross profit margin is the typical financial indicator used, rather than net margin, because the method evaluates cost-based returns rather than revenue-based profitability.

For the UAE market, comparability analysis must incorporate local regulatory conditions and commercial practices that differentiate free zone and mainland operations.

Compliance and Documentation Expectations in the UAE

The UAE’s corporate tax regime, along with economic substance requirements and transfer pricing regulations, places increasing emphasis on timely and robust documentation.

Companies that are part of multinational groups must be prepared to justify markup selection through contemporaneous transfer pricing files, intercompany agreements, and benchmarking reports.

Audit readiness is enhanced when documentation clearly outlines the economic rationale for markup selection, aligned with OECD guidance.

Given the fluidity of cross-border pricing rules, UAE entities increasingly rely on structured documentation, professional guidance, and sustained policy implementation to avoid disputes or audit penalties.

Sector-Specific Considerations

Manufacturing industries involved in technical production or tiered supply chain operations may justify higher markup brackets versus low-touch fabrication or semi-finished goods handling.

Service entities that provide high-value professional support, regional command functions, or specialised domain expertise generally attract stronger returns than administrative or logistical support units.

Sector sensitivity requires periodic benchmarking review to ensure ongoing adherence to commercial realities and updated market conditions.

Strategic Benefits of Adopting the Cost Plus Method

Beyond compliance, the Cost Plus Method supports operational transparency, predictable profitability, and easier internal budgeting.

It provides stability for low-risk entities while enabling multinational corporate groups to allocate earnings in line with functional contribution.

For companies operating in the UAE’s rapidly evolving regulatory environment, the method helps balance tax alignment with economic governance.

By integrating governance, documentation, and economic benchmarking, UAE businesses can reinforce defensibility while sustaining growth and cross-border operational performance.

The role of professional guidance becomes particularly relevant where evolving cross-border requirements and economic substance tests intersect with internal restructuring.

Many UAE-based multinational groups choose to supplement internal policy design with structured transfer pricing advisory to maintain consistently defensible business models.

Also Read: Resale Price Method Implementation: Distribution Markup Analysis